The Contractors Plan logo

Login Provider Login Send Secure Email Get A Quote
Participant Call Center (all benefits): 1-855-433-2981

California Supreme Court Asked to Decide Question That Could Significantly Affect California’s Prevailing Wage Laws

February 1, 2019


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Court of Appeals) has requested the California Supreme Court to answer a question regarding prevailing wage coverage applying to offsite “mobilization work” that is non-construction, non-job site work based upon its tie to a public works project.

The Court of Appeals requested the California Supreme Court to answer the following question of state law: “Is operating engineers’ offsite “mobilization work”—including the transportation to and from a public works site of roadwork grinding equipment—performed “in the execution of [a] contract for public work,” Cal. Lab. Code § 1772, such that it entitles workers to “not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed” pursuant to section 1771 of the California Labor Code?”

Initially, the Ninth District Court found that since the offsite “mobilization work” was not dependent on any public works project for their existence nor an integrated aspect of the flow process of construction that plaintiff workers were not entitled to the payment of prevailing wages for off-site mobilization work. However, the Court of Appeals noted that California courts had not previously addressed the application of the State’s prevailing wage law to off-site mobilization work.

The California Supreme Court is expected to grant the request and decide the issues presented by the Ninth Circuit. The decision will impact workers who haul other equipment to public works sites.

House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Aims to Pass Infrastructure Bill

January 23, 2019


In a January press release, Rep. Peter DeFazio, Chairman of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee (the Committee) for the 116th Congress, spoke of the possibility of crafting an infrastructure bill that could pass by early June. Chairman DeFazio reasons that there is strong bipartisan support for a significant infrastructure package that would lay the groundwork for generations to come.

Believing that every state and territory in the country is directly affected by the decisions made by the Committee, DeFazio said he is seeking a bipartisan agreement on legislation to strengthen the federal role for maintaining and providing access to transportation for all Americans. Looking to put an end to the impending transportation crisis in our country, Chairman DeFazio hopes to obtain the necessary spending measures for roads, bridges and many other public works.

Although there is still no consensus for how to pay for the infrastructure package, there seems to be plenty of bipartisan support. Even with current party tensions revolved around the partial government shutdown, President Trump’s stated desire for infrastructure reform has given DeFazio and others in his party confidence that this could be one issue that parties are willing to reach across the aisle to achieve.

It Appears The Government Shutdown Has No Apparent End In Sight

January 16, 2019


We recently posted a story in this blog about the temporary closing of E-Verify due to a partial lapse in federal funding. We brought it to your attention thinking it would be a temporary inconvenience and to direct you toward agency resources.

Since then it appears the government shutdown, which primarily involves funding for a border wall, has no apparent end in sight. While it only affects certain agencies — Departments of Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, State, Homeland Security, Interior, Justice, Treasury, Transportation, Commerce, and others — the repercussions will be felt more widespread the longer the lapse continues.

While the news focuses on the impact on federal employees as well as federal services such as Social Security checks, airport screening, national parks, and museums, and the ability of the IRS to conduct business, the impact on federal contractors is not insignificant. Affected contractors are increasingly asking questions so we wanted to take this opportunity to provide a little information regarding its impact on federal contracting and to direct you toward contracting information that may be helpful.

A very helpful resource to better understand federal contracting legal issues when there is a lapse in funding is the Congressional Research Service report titled, Government Procurement in Times of Fiscal Uncertainty, dated April 6, 2012 (R42469). A copy of this report can be viewed at https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42469.pdf  Below is a summary of key issues:

  • Both contractors and the agency personnel that administer contracts are paid with appropriated funds. Generally, if there is a lapse in appropriated funds, this would cause a lapse in the ability to award and manage contracts as well.
  • The federal government generally has broad discretion to cancel a solicitation at any time during a procurement before award.
  • The federal government also has broad discretion regarding exercising an option. Contractors are not entitled to any recovery of lost profits if the government chooses not to exercise an option.
  • Funding lapses generally prevent the government from entering new contracts or allocating new funding to cost-reimbursement contracts.
  • The government is permitted to make reductions in scope, alter the period of performance, or terminate contracts.

Please keep in mind that each circumstance is different, so there is no single answer to many of the questions we receive. It is important to note that past government shutdown experience has shown that some agencies are willing to work with government contractors and consider equitable adjustments, or other tools such as overtime, to offset lost work. Contractors should be documenting lost hours, and the impact on deliverables should this option become available.

Additionally, some unintended contract events occurred as a result of the shutdown including the previously mentioned shutdown of E-Verify, as well as limited functionality of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals.

This is not a legal opinion as to what contractors should do during a shutdown; rather it’s an effort to direct you toward some useful information.

Survey Shows Construction Industry Salaries Are On The Rise

January 7, 2019


In December, the National Center for Construction Education and Research (NCCER) announced results from their 2018 Construction Craft Salary Survey which indicates that salaries are on the rise in the construction industry. Findings also showed that skilled craft professionals continue to earn high wages.

The survey shows that in 2018 the annual salaries ranged from $47,771 to $92,523; up from 2015 when the range was $47,166 to $88,675. Findings also indicated that since 2015 the majority of the individual craft positions experienced an increase of 4-20 percent in their annual salaries.

Currently, the highest earning position remains that of project managers at $92,523 and supervisors at $88,355, while numerous professionals are earning over $65,000 such as combo and pipe welders, instrumentation technician, and industrial electrician. Two positions which saw the most dramatic pay increase from 2015 were HVAC technicians, up 20 percent, and sheet metal worker, up 18 percent.

One hundred thirty-two companies, representing 353,503 employees from the commercial and industrial construction industries, voluntarily provided data for this survey. Figures in the study represent average annual salaries for 32 specific individual craft areas, not including overtime, bonuses, per diem or other incentives.

E-Verify Inaccessible Due to Government Shutdown

December 27, 2018


Currently, employers will not be able to access their E-Verify accounts and services due to the federal government shutdown. The E-Verify program is run by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which is one of the agencies affected by the shutdown and until funding for the government is resolved these services will remain inaccessible. In the meantime, employers should plan to keep track of all new hires during this shutdown.

This means that while E-Verify is unavailable, employers will not be able to access their E-Verify accounts to create an E-Verify case, enroll ins E-Verify, view or take action on any case, add or edit any user accounts, reset passwords, terminate accounts or run reports. Also, employees will be unable to resolve E-Verify Tentative Nonconfirmations (TNCs).

Employers should also be aware that many upcoming webinars have been canceled and that there will be no telephone or email support during this time.

DHS recognizes that this has a significant impact on operations, and to help minimize the burden on both employers and employees they will be implementing the following policies:

  • The “three-day rule” for creating E-Verify cases is suspended for cases affected by the unavailability of E-Verify.
  • The period during which employees may resolve TNCs will be extended.
  • DHS will provide additional guidance regarding “three-day rule” and period to resolve TNCs deadlines once operations resume.
  • Employers may not take adverse action against an employee because the E-Verify case is in an interim case status, including while the employee’s case is in an extended interim case status due to the unavailability of E-Verify.
  • Federal contractors with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) E-Verify clause should contact their contracting officer to inquire about extending federal contractor deadlines.

The government shutdown may continue into the new year so employers should implement methods for keeping track of new hires and employee issues so that cases can be created once the system is back online. DHS also suggests the use of several of their free E-Verify resources which can be found at https://www.e-verify.gov/e-verify-and-e-verify-services-are-unavailable

Building Blocks For Retirement: Market Volatility

December 20, 2018


The stock market has exhibited significantly higher volatility thus far in the final quarter of 2018, with large up and down swings. This volatility is being driven by a number of different factors including uncertainty with the Federal Reserve’s potential interest rate path for 2019, the Trump administration tariffs proposal, the Brexit situation in Europe, and potentially slowing U.S. corporate earnings growth, among other factors. However, it is important to note that, in general, company fundamentals and global economic growth remain solid to strong.

Please click here to read the full document provided by Pentegra Retirement Plan Services.

Reports of Increasing Construction Labor Shortages

November 1, 2018


The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) recently published an Employment Situation Summary which highlighted the growing shortage of construction employees.  A month prior, the Autodesk and the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) issued findings of an industry-wide survey that found an overwhelming majority of construction firms are having a hard time finding qualified workers. These reports both support the fact that workforce shortages are on the increase and are affecting the industry’s economic growth.

In the BLS summary, the employment situation by industry in September 2018 shows that construction employment continued to trend up in September (+23,000) and has added 315,000 jobs over the past 12 months. Similarly, the Autodesk/AGC report found a widespread shortage of construction professionals with more than 80 percent of contractors surveyed unable to fill jobs. This report also noted that the “Nationwide Shortage of Skilled Workers Has Raised the Cost of Construction and Delayed Project Schedules, Putting Broader Economic Growth at Risk.”

As the construction labor shortage continues to grow in general, so does the competition for employees between public and private projects. One of the advantages of public projects is that employers can typically offer fringe benefits which can serve to attract and retain employees.

Study Identifies Drivers To Millennial’s Retirement Savings

October 22, 2018


Financial experts are concerned that Americans are not saving enough for retirement. Millennials are no exception, as they represent a vast majority of those who are not saving for their post-career lives. In a recent report by Navient, Money Under 35, a glimpse is provided at how Millennials look at retirement and what was shown to correlate with increased savings rates.

Money Under 35 is a national study that looked at the financial health of young Americans aged 22-35 and found that just 3 in 10 young Americans are saving and nearly 4 in 10 believe that saving for retirement can wait. Of those saving, the average amount saved for retirement in 2017 was a total of $32,818, a decrease from the prior year’s total of $37,638.

It appears that the driver behind the belief that retirement saving can wait is that young people are facing competing demands for their financial resources and making decisions between paying off debt and building their savings.

However, the study also found that the presence of a 401(k) plan correlates strongly with increased savings rates. Millennials whose employers offered a 401(k) match program were almost twice as likely to save for retirement than those whose employers did not, 61% and 31% respectively. Also, the young adults who were offered such a program have accumulated nearly twice the average savings, $32,851 compared with $18,879.

While young adults are confronted with competing financial goals, employers who offer 401(k) match programs do motivate Millennials to save for retirement which leads to improved financial health.

July 2018 Construction Spending

September 6, 2018


The U.S. Census Bureau announced construction spending for July 2018 was up at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1,315.4 billion, 0.1 percent above the revised estimate of $1,314.2 billion. During the first seven months of this year, construction spending amounted to $740.5 billion, 5.2 percent above the $703.7 billion for the same period in 2017.

While private construction spending was $1,010.9 billion, 0.1 percent below the revised June estimate of $1,011.9 billion; public construction spending was $304.5 billion which is up 0.7 percent above last month’s revised estimates of $302.3 billion. Public construction spending was also up 8.3% from this same time last year.

Two of the main contributors to the public construction spending growth in July come from educational construction, 2.1 percent above the revised June estimate of $70.1 billion, and highway construction, 0.4 percent above the revised June estimate of $93.8 billion.

More information may be found at:

https://www.census.gov/construction/c30/pdf/release.pdf

June 2018 Construction Spending

August 13, 2018


The U.S. Census Bureau announced construction spending for June 2018 which was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1,317.2 billion, 1.1 percent below the revised May estimate of $1,332.2 billion.

Despite the drop from May to June, June was 6.1 percent above the June 2017 estimate of $1,241.3 billion. Additionally, during the first six months of this year, construction spending amounted to $619.9 billion, 5.1 percent above the $589.6 billion for the same period in 2017.

While private construction spending was $1,019.8 billion, 0.4 below the revised May estimate of $1,023.9 billion; public construction spending was $297.4 billion, 3.5 percent below the revised May estimate of $308.3 billion. However, Total Public Construction is up 4.9% over June 2017. A couple of contributors to this growth are Transportation up 11.9%, and Highway & Streets up 6.3%.

More information may be found at:

https://www.census.gov/construction/c30/pdf/release.pdf